Logged in as: Public User

Standard MGS W-Beam with Weak Soil

Question
State IN
Description Text Would it be acceptable to place standard MGS w-beam guardrail (6 ft posts at 6'-3" post spacing and 2 ft of 10:1 slope behind the post) in weak soil?  We have projects where the soil is predominately peat.  After reading Q&A #1132, the standard system should be acceptable but we should assume a working width of 60 inches.  Do you have any additional thoughts. Thank you
Keywords
  • Guardrail
Other Keywords weak spoil, peat
Date November 27, 2018


Response
Response

The MGS system has not been evaluated in weak soils at this time, so a definitive answer on its performance in weak soils cannot be given. However, there is evidence that it may perform satisfactory with reduced soil strength.

 

Previous testing of the standard MGS with 6' long posts installed at the slope break point of a 2:1 slope found that the MGS could safely redirect a vehicle adjacent to a steep slope with reduced soil forces under MASH TL-3. However, the dynamic deflection of this system increased to 72.9" as compared to 44" for the standard MGS in strong soil. Thus, there would seem to be potential for the MGS to work in weak soils.

 

Similar comparisons can be made to W-beam systems tested to MASH TL-3 with larger deflections such as the G3 weak post W-beam, which had a dynamic deflection of 103.2", and the MGS long span, which had a deflection of 92".

 

Based on these tests of previous systems, it is reasonable that the MGS has the potential to function with weaker soil. However, it is not known what the strength/resistance levels of the peat soil in your state are or what the dynamic deflection or working width of a system installed in that soil would be.

 

Thus, we would anticipate that the MGS would redirect errant vehicles under MASH TL-3 impact conditions, but that system deflections would increase significantly. Quantifying the increase in deflection would be difficult without further study. These comments are also limited to the LON of the MGS system. Anchorages and/or end terminals and approach guardrail transition performance may be affected as well. We would also not recommend the use of the weak soil for MGS special applications without further study.

 

Date December 4, 2018


Contact Us:
130 Whittier Research Center
2200 Vine Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0853
(402) 472-0965
Email: mwrsf@unl.edu
Disclaimer:
The information contained on the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) website is subject to change without prior notice. The University of Nebraska and the MwRSF is not responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or misuse of or reliance upon any such content, goods, or services available on this site.