Logged in as: Public User

Guardrail Blockout compressive Strength

State NE
Description Text The importance of the 12” blockout in the MGS, from what I recall - is to keep the tire of the pickup away from the post.
Could a lightweight blockout weaker than what was tested improve the performance of the MGS?
Assuming the answer is no; Is there a minimum compressive strength of a guardrail blockout between the post & the back of guardrail?
Or What’s the strength needed to redirect the pickup away from the post when impacted?
  • Guardrail
Other Keywords Blockouts
Date August 15, 2018


The blockout was used to reduce wheel contact with the posts for both vehicle types and to hold the rail up longer during lateral post movement & rotation. The standard MGS was tested with 12” blocks (MwRSF and others), 8” blocks (TTI), and no blocks (MwRSF and others). We found improve performance for larger blocks versus no blocks, although all options worked for base configuration. With weaker blocks, those that fracture or crush, we would expect acceptable performance in the base configuration. However, I could not say that it would be improved performance over that observed with 12” wood blocks. Even with blocks, we may still have wheel contact with posts for both vehicle types. Unfortunately, we do not know the minimum compressive strength to provide similar safety performance to that observed for standard MGS with 12” wood blocks.

Date August 15, 2018

Contact Us:
130 Whittier Research Center
2200 Vine Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0853
(402) 472-0965
Email: mwrsf@unl.edu
The information contained on the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) website is subject to change without prior notice. The University of Nebraska and the MwRSF is not responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or misuse of or reliance upon any such content, goods, or services available on this site.