Logged in as: Public User

Short radius

Question
State NE
Description Text

Q about the w-beam perpendicular to the lanes of traffic beyond the short radius.

Should the CRT posts be placed on the portion of the guardrail which is perpendicular to the traveled way within the clear zone?

Or can these be full strength posts?

Keywords
  • Bullnose Median Barrier & Short Radius
Other Keywords none
Date December 28, 2011


Response
Response

The NDOR variation of the short radius guardrail system appears to be somewhat based on the original Yuma County (YC) curved barrier system that was crash tested and evaluated by SwRI researchers. In terms of CRT posts, it would be appropriate to carry out the CRT posts along the secondary length at least as far as utilized in the original YC crash testing program.

 

More recently, TTI researchers conducted an LS-DYNA analysis and investigation of a modified YC system according to the NCHRP Report No. 350 TL-2 impact conditions. Following this effort, the modified YC system was submitted to and accepted by FHWA. Copies of the acceptance letter and research report are attached.

 

At this time, neither the YC or modified YC designs have been adapted to 31" tall W-beam guardrail systems nor accepted by FHWA.

 

Date January 4, 2012
Attachment 70465e02.pdf
Attachment 405160-10-T-Intersection-Acceptance-Letter-B209_111710.pdf
Attachment T-Intersection-final_2010-08-17.pdf


Contact Us:
130 Whittier Research Center
2200 Vine Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0853
(402) 472-0965
Email: mwrsf@unl.edu
Disclaimer:
The information contained on the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) website is subject to change without prior notice. The University of Nebraska and the MwRSF is not responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or misuse of or reliance upon any such content, goods, or services available on this site.