Logged in as: Public User

TL-5 Barrier Height

Question
State WI
Description Text

Our structures department is in the process of developing guidance for their bridge designers. To comply with LRFD, the are asking me for a 54" tall TL5 barrier. Does MwRSF know of any TL5 crash tested barriers that are 54" tall?

 

Is it possible to modify the MwRSF TL5 barrier to be 54" tall? Does it make much sense to construct a 54" tall barrier verses a 42" barrier to protect a pier from a semi truck leaning over and striking the pier of a bridge? How far has TTI gotten with their research on the LRFD 400 KIP load requirement?

Keywords
  • Permanent Concrete Barriers
Other Keywords none
Date June 16, 2008


Response
Response

To date, I am aware of one TL-5 barrier that was 54 in. tall and one TL-6 barrier that was 90 in. tall. These barriers are described and referenced in MwRSF Research Report No. TRP-03-149-04. A copy of this report is included in this email. Other TL-5 barriers are noted in this report as well. MwRSF developed two TL-5 bridge railings and median barriers that are not included in this report. Those barrier systems and associated reports have been sent to you previously. If you need additional copies, I can send them to you in pdf format.

 

For the MwRSF barrier, a 54 in. median version could be developed as long as the additional height did not penetrate the head ejection envelope. This change would cause the barrier width to increase significantly and without knowledge as to how much trailer lean would still occur over the barrier.

The upper barrier section would also get more complex and costly. What distance is available from the front face of a barrier to the front face of a pier? Are you more concerned with vehicles hitting the piers head on or from allowing the box to lean over and snag on the pier? Remember that the box lean will not impart as high as a load as would a head-on impact. Head on impacts could be prevent using long TL-5 barriers that provide adequate length of need protection. I recall that we had 1 or 2 Pooled Fund problem statements that addressed this issue but were held back to wait for the TTI/TxDOT study to be completed.

 

I received a note from Gene Buth with regard to the site where updates can be found pertaining to the TTI/TxDOT pier protection project. See link below:

 

It is TPF-5(106) and it is at:

http://www.pooledfund.org/projectdetails.asp?id=338&status=6

Date June 19, 2008
Attachment TRP-03-149-04.pdf


Contact Us:
130 Whittier Research Center
2200 Vine Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0853
(402) 472-0965
Email: mwrsf@unl.edu
Disclaimer:
The information contained on the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) website is subject to change without prior notice. The University of Nebraska and the MwRSF is not responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or misuse of or reliance upon any such content, goods, or services available on this site.