Logged in as: Public User

Caltrans Barrier Request

Question
State WI
Description Text

Has MwRSF looked into :

 

1. TL-3 Working widths for various heights of caltrans barrier?

2. A recommendation on what to do near fixed objects (e.g. go with taller barrier, go with vertical barrier, go with taller and vertical barrier) in areas where working width is reduced?

Keywords
  • Permanent Concrete Barriers
Other Keywords none
Date September 30, 2008


Response
Response

MwRSF has reviewed available information on the working widths and zone-of-intrusion (ZOI) values for the single-slope, concrete barriers evaluated by MwRSF and CALTRANS. Based on this information, the working width and zone-of-intrusion measures for the 32-in. tall, single-slope barrier are approximately 27 and 21 in., respectively. The published ZOI value for the prior TL-3 impacts into 32" tall, sloped-face barriers is 18", while 24" was provided for vertical-face barriers. Actually, the single-slope barrier would likely fall between the two noted ZOI values, thus substantiating the 21" measurement from test no. ZOI-2. The maximum effective height for this lateral extent was nearly 42 in. As such, a conservative approximation would be to use the 27-in. working width value from 32 to 42 in. Beyond the 42-in. barrier height, the ZOI would be approximately zero for TL-3 conditions and valid through the 56-in. barrier height. Thus, the working width for 42 to 56-in. tall, single-slope barriers would be the base barrier width or 24 in.

 

Please note that these ZOI values provide conservative results for the placement of fixed objects on and nearby the barrier system. Actually, a fixed object could be placed closer to the top-front corner of the barrier as long as acceptable crash performance was obtained.

 

Previously, MwRSF provided guidance for selecting the top geometry of taller vertical, or near vertical barriers, in an effort to prevent head contact with tall barriers. A head ejection envelope was provided. However, guidance was not provided for sloped-face barriers in terms of the recommended top-barrier geometry or head ejection envelope.

 

In summary, here are my suggestions:

 

SS Barrier Height        WW                             ZOI

32"                               27                                21

36"                               27 (assumed)               ?? (measured from top front corner but unknown)

42" (<)                         27 (assumed)               ?? (measured from top front corner but unknown)

42" (>)                         24 (barrier width)        0

51"                              24 (barrier width)        0

56"                              24 (barrier width)        0

 

Vertical Barrier Height

32"                               24                               24 (vertical barrier has toe and front corner at same position)

Date October 2, 2008


Contact Us:
130 Whittier Research Center
2200 Vine Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0853
(402) 472-0965
Email: mwrsf@unl.edu
Disclaimer:
The information contained on the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) website is subject to change without prior notice. The University of Nebraska and the MwRSF is not responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or misuse of or reliance upon any such content, goods, or services available on this site.