Logged in as: Public User

Steep slopes within transitions

Question
State IA
Description Text

We are looking
at a situation where we have steep slopes in the neighborhood of 2:1
immediately adjacent to a culvert headwall, to which we are attaching
thrie-beam across the face. Recent testing (TRP-03-234-10) has
focused on longer posts at the 2:1 breakover with the caveat it still needs at
least 4 ft of 2:1 beyond the breakover before steeper slopes or a hazard are
introduced (Q/A #610).
However, I’m unsure if this longer post guidance can also be used in our
barrier transition sections (BA-201)
or if it is strictly limited to standard w-beam situations. I found Q/A #525 from before the 2:1
breakover study that recommended at least 2 ft of 10:1 behind transition posts
until further notice but presume there has since been discussion about
transition posts in the development of the 2:1 studies. Would you please share
the current approach to steeper slopes within transition sections?

Keywords
  • Approach Guardrail Transitions
Other Keywords Slopes
Date October 17, 2016


Response
Response

We addressed something similar for Ohio. Take a look at that response and let me know if that answers your questions.

 

http://mwrsf-qa.unl.edu/view.php?id=1044

 

Thanks 

Date October 17, 2016


Contact Us:
130 Whittier Research Center
2200 Vine Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0853
(402) 472-0965
Email: mwrsf@unl.edu
Disclaimer:
The information contained on the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) website is subject to change without prior notice. The University of Nebraska and the MwRSF is not responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or misuse of or reliance upon any such content, goods, or services available on this site.