|Logged in as: Public User|
We have a number of installations of approach transitions to rigid barrier and beam guard where the sidewalk is directly or in close proximity to the back of post.
Some of our project teams have installed wood planks at about rail height at the back of post to prevent pedestrians or bikes from snagging into the posts.
It may stiffen up the system a little, but I don't see a problem with this so long as it is not within an end terminal.
There could also be some additional debris from an impact as well.
Many of these locations are 45 mph or less posted speed.
I'll try to find a drawing or photos of what they are doing.
What is your thoughts?
|Date||November 23, 2015|
|Response||In reviewing this type of installation, there are some concerns about debris and the potential for the backside 2x10 rail to detach from the back of the post during impact and become a hazard to the impacting vehicle.
As such, we would likely recommend that this type of installation be evaluated through full-scale crash testing for TL-3 applications. For TL-2 applications like the ones you note above, the concerns with debris and interaction of the rail with impacting vehicles is much lower. Thus, we believe that the timber railing has the potential to be used in lower speed applications without adversely affecting the safety performance of the guardrail or AGT.
|Date||November 24, 2015|
130 Whittier Research Center
2200 Vine Street
Lincoln, NE 68583-0853
The information contained on the Midwest Roadside Safety Facility (MwRSF) website is subject to change without prior notice. The University of Nebraska and the MwRSF is not responsible or liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use or misuse of or reliance upon any such content, goods, or services available on this site.